Life without school obviously does not have to mean a life without education. School educates. Life educates. A question may be, "What kind of education?" Another question might be, "What does it mean to be educated?" Yet another, "What is the purpose of education?" Another, "Do these purposes apply to all people and must the goals of such purposes be met the same way?" Can the "how, what when, where, and why" people learn be different?
What if one entity/group of folks, determined the "how, what, when, where, and why" every other person in the world was educated? What if one entity/group of folks determined the "how, what, when, where, and why" every other person in the world ate, drank, obtained spiritual fulfillment, and..you fill in the blank. What makes education a dictatorial component of a free society? Why can't the government ban junk food and propose a program of food consumption for my children? Why doesn't the government control these things and more? What makes education different?
Surely a non-educated society can affect a nation as a whole. So does a physically unhealthy society. I can expand this string of thought to compliment my personal belief system and say that a society of addictive consumption and commercialism also affects this society.
Where and why does education come into the arena of government domain? What would happen if mandatory school attendance was stricken down? Would children go out of control? Would they start roaming the streets and commit crimes? Would they stop learning? Would they learn the "wrong things" and not learn the "right things?" What would happen?
I don't want to get into the political aspects of whether the goverment should fund education at all. But I do ask why the government needs to enforce education and police parents in the education of their children under a compulsory attendance law.
One could debate that life is school. As long as one is alive, one is learning something. What something is more important than another something? Learning to read and write? Learning about a democratic society? Learning to wait to be told to learn to believe that a test can actually determine the quality of your learning life? Learning not to ask questions unless told to? Learning to be bored and powerless in your own boredom because you cannot learn, explore, investigate what is not on the officially sanctioned list?
Compulsory attendance does not say compulsory education or compulsory learning. From what I understand, if it did, then the public school system would be accountable and that is proving to be a disastrous experiment with NCLB, isn't it? The results have been the "dumbing down" of how children really, truly naturally learn. It has taken a social, personal, natural process and reduced it mandatory paint by numbers, an assembly line curriculum for the masses. What has resulted is a one dimensional, "regurgitate the facts I feed you" life for a child. You cannot mass produce education because children are individual, living breathing human beings. You mass produce objects and people/children learn who they are by how you treat them.
The more standards we create, the more specifics we hold to those standards the more we create an education for a mass entity, not a single child. We forget that are raising children. We forget the child.
I've rambled. What were my original questions? Oh, right. How do we help our children become empowered in who they need to be? How do we empower parents to meet the needs of their children? Certainly the rest will take care of itself. Certainly there are no perfect solutions, but there can be more reasonable and humane perspective. Where do we draw the line of mandatory government involvement into personal lives?